Questions
What is the main difference between libel and slander?
- Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation.
- Libel is more serious than slander.
- Libel requires special damages, while slander does not.
- All of the above.
What are the four elements of a libel or slander claim?
- Publication, falsity, malice, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, intent, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, negligence, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, strict liability, and damages.
What is the difference between actual malice and implied malice?
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff's reputation, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with negligence, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with strict liability, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
What are some defenses to a libel or slander claim?
- Truth, privilege, consent, and fair comment.
- Truth, privilege, mistake, and fair comment.
- Truth, privilege, negligence, and fair comment.
- Truth, privilege, strict liability, and fair comment.
What are some examples of statements that are considered defamatory per se?
- Statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity.
- Statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud.
- Statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession.
- All of the above.
What is the statute of limitations for a libel or slander claim?
- One year.
- Two years.
- Three years.
- Four years.
What are some of the remedies available to a plaintiff who has been defamed?
- Damages, injunction, and retraction.
- Damages, specific performance, and rescission.
- Damages, restitution, and disgorgement.
- Damages, reformation, and cancellation.
What is the difference between a libel suit and a slander suit?
- A libel suit is based on written defamation, while a slander suit is based on spoken defamation.
- A libel suit requires the plaintiff to prove special damages, while a slander suit does not.
- A libel suit is more likely to be successful than a slander suit.
- All of the above.
What are the defenses to a libel or slander suit?
- Truth, privilege, fair comment, and consent.
- Truth, privilege, mistake, and consent.
- Truth, privilege, negligence, and consent.
- Truth, privilege, strict liability, and consent.
What are the damages that can be awarded in a libel or slander suit?
- Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and nominal damages.
- Compensatory damages, specific performance, and rescission.
- Compensatory damages, restitution, and disgorgement.
- Compensatory damages, reformation, and cancellation.
What is the statute of limitations for a libel or slander suit?
- One year.
- Two years.
- Three years.
- Four years.
What are some examples of statements that are considered defamatory per se?
- Statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity.
- Statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud.
- Statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession.
- All of the above.
What is the difference between libel and slander?
- Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation.
- Libel is more serious than slander.
- Libel requires special damages, while slander does not.
- All of the above.
What are the four elements of a libel or slander claim?
- Publication, falsity, malice, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, intent, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, negligence, and damages.
- Publication, falsity, strict liability, and damages.
What is the difference between actual malice and implied malice?
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff's reputation, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with negligence, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.
- Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with strict liability, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.