Home › Quizzes › Judicial Review in the United States

Judicial Review in the United States

This quiz will test your knowledge on Judicial Review in the United States.

14 Questions Published
Play Quiz Practise this topic out loud

Questions

Question 1 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional?

  1. Judicial Review
  2. Legislative Review
  3. Executive Review
  4. Constitutional Review
Question 2 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which case established the principle of judicial review in the United States?

  1. Marbury v. Madison
  2. McCulloch v. Maryland
  3. Gibbons v. Ogden
  4. Fletcher v. Peck
Question 3 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Who was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court when Marbury v. Madison was decided?

  1. John Marshall
  2. Oliver Ellsworth
  3. William Cushing
  4. Samuel Chase
Question 4 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What was the main issue in Marbury v. Madison?

  1. The constitutionality of the Judiciary Act of 1789
  2. The constitutionality of the Alien and Sedition Acts
  3. The constitutionality of the Louisiana Purchase
  4. The constitutionality of the Embargo Act of 1807
Question 5 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What did the Supreme Court hold in Marbury v. Madison?

  1. That the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional
  2. That the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional
  3. That the Louisiana Purchase was unconstitutional
  4. That the Embargo Act of 1807 was unconstitutional
Question 6 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the doctrine of stare decisis?

  1. The doctrine of precedent
  2. The doctrine of judicial review
  3. The doctrine of constitutional interpretation
  4. The doctrine of separation of powers
Question 7 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

How does the doctrine of stare decisis affect judicial review?

  1. It requires courts to follow the precedents of higher courts
  2. It requires courts to follow the precedents of lower courts
  3. It requires courts to follow the precedents of other courts in the same jurisdiction
  4. It requires courts to follow the precedents of courts in other jurisdictions
Question 8 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the difference between judicial review and legislative review?

  1. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while legislative review is the power of the legislature to declare judicial decisions unconstitutional
  2. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while legislative review is the power of the legislature to declare executive acts unconstitutional
  3. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while legislative review is the power of the legislature to declare judicial decisions unconstitutional
  4. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while legislative review is the power of the legislature to declare executive acts unconstitutional
Question 9 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the difference between judicial review and executive review?

  1. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while executive review is the power of the executive to declare legislative or judicial acts unconstitutional
  2. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while executive review is the power of the executive to declare legislative acts unconstitutional
  3. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while executive review is the power of the executive to declare judicial acts unconstitutional
  4. Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional, while executive review is the power of the executive to declare legislative or judicial acts unconstitutional
Question 10 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What are the limits of judicial review?

  1. The courts can only declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional if they are in violation of the Constitution
  2. The courts can only declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional if they are in violation of the Constitution or a statute
  3. The courts can only declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional if they are in violation of the Constitution, a statute, or a treaty
  4. The courts can only declare legislative or executive acts unconstitutional if they are in violation of the Constitution, a statute, a treaty, or a regulation
Question 11 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What are the consequences of judicial review?

  1. The legislative or executive act that is declared unconstitutional is void
  2. The legislative or executive act that is declared unconstitutional is void and the courts can issue an injunction to prevent its enforcement
  3. The legislative or executive act that is declared unconstitutional is void and the courts can issue a writ of mandamus to compel the government to take action
  4. The legislative or executive act that is declared unconstitutional is void and the courts can issue a writ of prohibition to prevent the government from taking action
Question 12 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the difference between a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition?

  1. A writ of mandamus compels the government to take action, while a writ of prohibition prevents the government from taking action
  2. A writ of mandamus prevents the government from taking action, while a writ of prohibition compels the government to take action
  3. A writ of mandamus compels the government to take action, while a writ of prohibition prevents the government from taking action
  4. A writ of mandamus prevents the government from taking action, while a writ of prohibition compels the government to take action
Question 13 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the difference between a writ of certiorari and a writ of error?

  1. A writ of certiorari is used to review a decision of a lower court, while a writ of error is used to review a decision of a higher court
  2. A writ of certiorari is used to review a decision of a higher court, while a writ of error is used to review a decision of a lower court
  3. A writ of certiorari is used to review a decision of a lower court, while a writ of error is used to review a decision of a higher court
  4. A writ of certiorari is used to review a decision of a higher court, while a writ of error is used to review a decision of a lower court
Question 14 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the difference between a writ of habeas corpus and a writ of amparo?

  1. A writ of habeas corpus is used to challenge the legality of a person's detention, while a writ of amparo is used to challenge the constitutionality of a law
  2. A writ of habeas corpus is used to challenge the constitutionality of a law, while a writ of amparo is used to challenge the legality of a person's detention
  3. A writ of habeas corpus is used to challenge the legality of a person's detention, while a writ of amparo is used to challenge the constitutionality of a law
  4. A writ of habeas corpus is used to challenge the constitutionality of a law, while a writ of amparo is used to challenge the legality of a person's detention
← Back to Quizzes