The Electoral College
Test your knowledge about the Electoral College system, its mechanics, history, and debates about reform.
Questions
What is the purpose of the Electoral College?
- To ensure that the candidate with the most popular votes wins the presidency.
- To give each state an equal say in the presidential election.
- To prevent fraud and ensure the integrity of the election.
- To select the president if no candidate receives a majority of the popular vote.
How many electoral votes does each state have?
- The same number as its population.
- The same number as its senators and representatives in Congress.
- The same number as its senators.
- The same number as its representatives in Congress.
How are electors chosen?
- By the state legislature.
- By the governor of the state.
- By the popular vote in each state.
- By the national party conventions.
When do electors meet to cast their votes?
- On the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December.
- On the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
- On the first Wednesday after the first Tuesday in November.
- On the second Monday after the first Tuesday in November.
What happens if no candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes?
- The election is decided by the House of Representatives.
- The election is decided by the Senate.
- The election is decided by the Supreme Court.
- The election is decided by a popular vote.
Has there ever been a time when the candidate who won the popular vote did not win the electoral vote?
- Yes, it has happened four times.
- Yes, it has happened twice.
- Yes, it has happened once.
- No, it has never happened.
What is the main criticism of the Electoral College?
- It is undemocratic because it allows a candidate to win the presidency without winning the popular vote.
- It gives too much power to small states.
- It is too complicated and confusing.
- It is outdated and should be abolished.
What are some proposals for reforming the Electoral College?
- Abolish the Electoral College and elect the president by popular vote.
- Keep the Electoral College, but require the candidate who wins the popular vote to also win the electoral vote.
- Keep the Electoral College, but change the way electors are chosen.
- Keep the Electoral College, but reduce the number of electors from each state.
What are the arguments in favor of keeping the Electoral College?
- It ensures that each state has a say in the presidential election.
- It prevents a candidate from winning the presidency with a small majority of the popular vote.
- It encourages candidates to campaign in all states, not just the large ones.
- It is part of the US Constitution and should not be changed.
What are the arguments against keeping the Electoral College?
- It is undemocratic because it allows a candidate to win the presidency without winning the popular vote.
- It gives too much power to small states.
- It is too complicated and confusing.
- It is outdated and should be abolished.
Has there ever been a movement to abolish the Electoral College?
- Yes, there have been several attempts to abolish the Electoral College.
- No, there has never been a movement to abolish the Electoral College.
- Yes, there was one attempt to abolish the Electoral College in the 19th century.
- No, there has never been a serious attempt to abolish the Electoral College.
What is the likelihood of the Electoral College being abolished in the near future?
- Very likely.
- Somewhat likely.
- Unlikely.
- Very unlikely.
What are some of the potential consequences of abolishing the Electoral College?
- It would make the presidential election more democratic.
- It would give more power to large states.
- It would make it easier for third-party candidates to win the presidency.
- It would make the presidential election more unpredictable.
What are some of the potential consequences of keeping the Electoral College?
- It would ensure that each state has a say in the presidential election.
- It would prevent a candidate from winning the presidency with a small majority of the popular vote.
- It would encourage candidates to campaign in all states, not just the large ones.
- It would make the presidential election more predictable.