Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension Test

Comprehensive test covering critical reasoning, grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure, and reading comprehension passages

35 Questions Published

Questions

Question 1 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: A brief passage or a statement is given and a question is asked, based on the information provided in the passage/statement. Critically examine the five alternative answer options marked (1) to (5) and choose the best answer.
�I think, therefore I am.�
This conclusion suffers from the fault of

  1. being simple
  2. being paradoxical
  3. being sequential
  4. being circular
  5. being void ab initio
Question 2 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: A brief passage or a statement is given and a question is asked, based on the information provided in the passage/statement. Critically examine the five alternative answer options marked (1) to (5) and choose the best answer.
�Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely�
You are most likely to refute your opponent's argument using the above line, if he says that

  1. Power flows from the barrel of the gun
  2. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown
  3. The opposition parties are redundant in a democracy and are valuable only for their decibel- power.
  4. Power and responsibility must go hand in hand.
  5. Political power is a function of one's professed honesty in public
Question 3 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: A brief passage or a statement is given and a question is asked, based on the information provided in the passage/statement. Critically examine the five alternative answer options marked (1) to (5) and choose the best answer.
I won't play with your dog because I'll be scratching my body all the time if I do. Thrice in the past I have played with it and each time, it makes me adopt ridiculous postures, scratching myself all over the body.
The above argument is most like which of the following ones?

  1. Atax's beloved must be allergic to chrysanthemums. Every time Atax presents her a chrysanthemum, she becomes very miserable and starts coughing.
  2. The panel's projections must have been valid, because it predicted a crisis, and it is here before us all exactly as hade been predicted.
  3. Allatrine tends to enhance human fertility and multiple-births. Every woman administered the drug in tests gave birth to multiple babies.
  4. Industrial effluents flowing into the river caused the death of aquatic animals. No animals died when the effluents had been dumped into the sea.
  5. My child loves going to the Xenon multiplex. Every time he goes there, he has a whale of a time. We are looking forward to this weekend when he goes there to have great fun.
Question 4 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: A brief passage or a statement is given and a question is asked, based on the information provided in the passage/statement. Critically examine the five alternative answer options marked (1) to (5) and choose the best answer.
�Anne goes out alone during day-light hours, but goes out after dark, only if both Fruity and Cherry are with her.�
Which of the following conclusions can be logically inferred from the statements above?

  1. If it is dark and Fruity is with Anne, Anne will go out.
  2. If Cherry is going out, both Fruity and Anne are with her.
  3. If Fruity is not with Anne, Anne is not going out.
  4. If Anne is going out alone, it is before 6.00 p.m.
  5. If it is dark and Anne is going out, Fruity is with her.
Question 5 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: In the following question, there are two statements which can be combined into a single statement in a number of different ways without changing their meaning. Below them are given three probable starters of such combined sentence. Decide upon which is/are correct, if any, and answer the questions.
STATEMENTS:
I like this book very much.
I must buy it.
STARTERS:
I. For the reason that ____
II. As ____
III. Because ____

  1. Both I and II are correct
  2. Both II and III are correct
  3. Both I and III are correct
  4. All of the above
  5. None of the above
Question 6 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: A brief passage or a statement is given and a question is asked, based on the information provided in the passage/statement. Critically examine the five alternative answer options marked (1) to (5) and choose the best answer.
“Ronaldo scored at least ten goals in the last World Cup Soccer Tournament”.
This inference can be logically deduced from which of the following statements?

  1. The average score in terms of goals of all those included in Ronaldo's team was at least above 10.
  2. Had someone not scored ten goals, he would have been refused a berth on the team, Ronaldo was offered a berth on the team for the next tournament.
  3. Only those having scored at least ten goals can see the opening ceremony. Ronaldo can watch the parade ceremony.
  4. In green-room pre-match briefings, no one scoring less than ten goals in the last tournament is ever seated on the first few rows of sofas. Ronaldo is seated in the fourth row.
Question 7 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: In the following question, there are two statements which can be combined into a single statement in a number of different ways without changing their meaning. Below them are given three probable starters of such combined sentence. Decide upon which is/are correct, if any, and answer the questions.
STATEMENTS:
They have decided to bury the hatchet.
They will be friends once again.
STARTERS:
I. They will be friends once again, ____
II. Since they have ____
III. Having decided ____

  1. Both I and II are correct
  2. Both II and III are correct
  3. Both I and III are correct
  4. All of the above
Question 8 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: Three sentences are given below. One, two or all the sentences may have error(s) of grammar or syntax or standard English usage. Identify only the sentence/s that is/are incorrect.

A. To restore the peace the elements tending to subvert the security of the country should be put down ruthlessly.
B. He has got into hot waters for defying his boss and entering into an argument with him.
C. Raminder shall bring the bag along. He has to.

  1. Only A
  2. Only B
  3. Only C
  4. Both A and B
  5. Both B and C
Question 9 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: Three sentences are given below. One, two or all the sentences may have error(s) of grammar or syntax or standard English usage. Identify only the sentences that are incorrect.
(A) On the birthday of the leader, his every follower called on him and felicitated him.
(B) It is a characteristic of a good novel that it does not leave us as dissatisfied at the end.
(C) He is his own boss and refuses to be dictated.

  1. Only A
  2. Only B
  3. Both A and B
  4. Both B and C
  5. Only C
Question 10 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: Three sentences are given below. One, two or all the sentences may have error(s) of grammar or syntax or standard English usage. Identify only the sentences that are incorrect.
(A) I for whom the letter was meant, is affected far less than my friend who happened to read it.
(B) There was not a single voice of dissent, and yet the proposal could not be put through the paces.
(C) From each according to his capacity to each according to his need, is the guiding principle of communism.

  1. Only A
  2. Only B
  3. Both A and B
  4. Both B and C
  5. Neither A nor B
Question 11 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: For each blank select one entry from the corresponding column of choices. Fill all the blanks in the way that best completes the sentence.
What is so frequently termed feminine indecision, the (i) of women to make up their minds, is in fact a/an (ii)_ reflection of the 'trigger-thinking' of man.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
inability inverted
incapacity direct
failure inverse

  1. incapacity, inverted
  2. inability, direct
  3. inability, inverse
  4. incapacity, direct
  5. failure, inverse
Question 12 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: For each blank select one entry from the corresponding column of choices. Fill all the blanks in the way that best completes the sentence.
Women are more ready to make (i), to consider the alternative possibilities and see the other colours and _(ii) in the range between black and white.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
compromises gradations
adjustments variations
sacrifice mutations

  1. compromises, variations
  2. adjustments, gradations
  3. sacrifices, variations
  4. sacrifices, mutations
  5. compromises, gradations
Question 13 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: For each blank select one entry from the corresponding column of choices. Fill all the blanks in the way that best completes the sentence.
A black hole is a body which is (i)__ because its gravitational pull is so strong that even light cannot escape from its (ii)___
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
dark vicinity
imperceptible gravity
invisible proximity

  1. invisible, gravity
  2. invisible, vicinity
  3. dark, proximity
  4. imperceptible, gravity
  5. None of these
Question 14 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: The question is a logical sequence of sentences with a missing link, the location of which is shown parenthetically. From the four choices available, you are required to choose the one which best fits the sequence logically.
Every American President has a “religion”, a creed to guide him in office. The new President's creed may be called the “New Covenant”. It is a solemn agreement between the people and their government based not simply on what each can take, but on what all must give. It offers opportunity even as it demands responsibility. (……………………………………………………………………………………….. .)

  1. Its slogan is: Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.
  2. It is a one-way traffic.
  3. It is: Ask what your country can do for you and what you can do for your country.
  4. It is just tit for tat.
Question 15 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: The question is a logical sequence of sentences with a missing link, the location of which is shown parenthetically. From the four choices available, you are required to choose the one which best fits the sequence logically.
As many as two million elderly Americans a year suffer from abuse or neglect. They are victims of outright physical abuse, subtle neglect or psychological mistreatment. The offenders are their own relatives or trusted caretakers. (………………………………………………………………….) Malnutrition, depression and even bruises and welts are simply ascribed to the presumed frailties of old age or chronic disease.

  1. They are impatiently waiting for the old people to die.
  2. Too often such mistreatment goes unrecognized.
  3. It is not difficult to acknowledge such ill-treatment.
  4. The reasons are not far to seek.
Question 16 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: The question is a logical sequence of sentences with a missing link, the location of which is shown parenthetically. From the four choices available, you are required to choose the one which best fits the sequence logically.
The pursuit of social success is the most important obstacle to happiness in a competitive society. I am not denying, however, that success is an important ingredient in happiness. (………………………….) If you don't have some spontaneous “useless” pleasures, you will be miserable. Living for social success is living by a theory, and all living by theory is dusty and desiccatory.

  1. Further, happiness is what most people live for.
  2. But it does not by itself suffice to satisfy most people.
  3. Further, man should have some lofty goals in life.
  4. There aren't many other things that can compare with success in its intrinsic value.
Question 17 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:" 'times="" new="" roman';="" font-size:="" medium;="">Directions: The question is a logical sequence of sentences with a missing link, the location of which is shown parenthetically. From the four choices available, you are required to choose the one which best fits the sequence logically.
(………………………………………..). We have engineered cars, therefore, with engines whose performance reduces fuel consumption and emissions. That is also why we now construct cars with more and more recyclable and non-polluting materials. And we dampen the sound caused by incoming air and outgoing exhaust. We also build our engines with special components to insure that our cars leave only a minimum of noise in their path.

  1. Our motto is: “The customer is our master!”
  2. People's tastes vary, and to be successfully competitive, we have to cater for different and demanding tastes.
  3. The cost of living keeps rising and we are aware that you want to economise.
  4. We know that you will enjoy a car most when you are at ease with its ecological impact on the world outside.
Question 18 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: For each blank select one entry from the corresponding column of choices. Fill all the blanks in the way that best completes the sentence.
The cockroach, that (i) creature and the housewife's persistent foe (ii) the dinosaur and could even survive a nuclear disaster.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
repulsive ancestors
repellant predates
repugnant precedes

  1. repellant, predates
  2. repugnant, precedes
  3. repulsive, precedes
  4. repulsive, ancestors
  5. repugnant, predates
Question 19 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: For each blank select one entry from the corresponding column of choices. Fill all the blanks in the way that best completes the sentence.
An (i)_ or clouding of the lens which ____ (ii)___ passage of light occurs at an advanced age.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
opacity prevents
obfuscation impedes
obliquity impairs

  1. obfuscation, impedes
  2. obliquity, prevents
  3. opacity, impairs
  4. obfuscation, prevents
  5. obliquity, impairs
Question 20 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Directions: The question is a logical sequence of sentences with a missing link, the location of which is shown parenthetically. From the four choices available, you are required to choose the one which best fits the sequence logically.

There was a time when every hiccup from Moscow made headlines around the world. With the end of the cold war, the media shifted their attention to the other parts of the world. (…………………………….) That is why we have devoted a large section of this issue to a special report on Russia. The former Soviet Union’s fate is still important to America and the rest of the world, we feel.

  1. This is because significant things are happening in many parts of the globe.
  2. And with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the U.S.A. has become the sole superpower.
  3. Yet the tumultuous transformation of the former Soviet Union remains one of the biggest stories of the decades.
  4. Still the former Soviet Union continues to be an economic superpower, if not a political superpower.
  5. The nuisance value may have diminished, but the threat remains.
Question 21 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following purposes is served by the first paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole?

PASSAGE – I

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations — novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/ 4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements.  Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families — 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.
  1. It sums up a major point of discussion, which is being explained by the rest of the passage.
  2. It sums up a major point of discussion, with the rest of the passage trying to explain why the efforts to decode autism have been unsuccessful.
  3. It discusses Wigler's work and how it has been instrumental in accounting for genetic basis of autism.
  4. It highlights a major point i.e. females carry autism more frequently and the rest of the passages discusses the reasons for it.
  5. It highlights a major unanswered question in autism research and the rest of the passage is again silent on it.
Question 22 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is a major problem in uncovering the genetic basis of autism in terms of the conventional approach?

PASSAGE – I

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations — novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/ 4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements.  Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families — 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.
  1. Too many chromosomes are responsible for it.
  2. There is great, complex interaction among different chromosomes responsible for autism, which is not amenable to studies.
  3. There is no clarity as to which chromosome is responsible for autism.
  4. Not enough subjects are available for studies.
  5. None of these
Question 23 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following could have been the most suitable title for the above passage?

PASSAGE – I

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations — novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/ 4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements.  Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families — 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.
  1. Autistic Research: Some New Trends
  2. Wigler's Work on Autism: Some Unanswered Questions
  3. The Genetic Basis of Autism: Wigler's Work
  4. The Failure of Conventional Studies on Autism
  5. How Do Spontaneous Mutations Cause Autism?
Question 24 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The author could have been all of the following except

PASSAGE – III

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Why do we divide a minute into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, while there are only 24 hours in a day? Currently, the most prevalent numeral system is decimal (base 10), which possibly originated as it enabled easier counting with fingers. The civilizations that first split the day into smaller parts, nevertheless, used different numeral systems, notably duodecimal (base 12) and sexagesimal (base 60).

Most historians opine that the Egyptians were the first to divide the day into smaller parts. The first of the sundials they created were just stakes placed on the ground that indicated time by the length and direction of the resulting shadow. By 15th century B.C., they had developed a more advanced sundial. Without artificial light, humans at that time considered sunlit and dark periods to be two opposing realms. When sundials were used first, however, the Egyptians also first observed a group of 36 stars which divided the circle of the heavens. The clepsydra i.e. water clock, was also used to record time at night, and was perhaps the most accurate timekeeping device of its times.
Later the concept of a 24-hour day arose. The concept of fixed-length hours, however, originated in the Hellenistic period. Hipparchus proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours. Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours.

Hipparchus and other Greek scientists used astronomical techniques developed by the Babylonians. They made calculations in the sexagesimal (base 60) system. Although we do not know why 60 was chosen, it is convenient for expressing fractions, since it is the smallest number divisible by the first six counting numbers and also by 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

The Greek astronomer Eratosthenes used a sexagesimal system to divide a circle into 60 parts. Abou 100 years later, Hipparchus normalized the lines of latitude and also invented a system of longitude lines that encompassed 360 degrees. In his treatise Almagest, Ptolemy expanded Hipparchus' work by subdividing each of the 360 degrees of latitude and longitude. Each degree was divided into 60 parts, each subdivided into 60 parts. The first division, partes minutae primae, or first minute, became known as the "minute." The second segmentation, partes minutae secundae, or "second minute," became known as the second.

However, minutes and seconds, were not used for everyday timekeeping until many centuries. Clock displays split the hour into halves, thirds, quarters and sometimes even 12 parts, but never by 60. In fact, the hour was not commonly understood to be 60 minutes. It was not practical for the general public to consider minutes until the first mechanical displaying minutes appeared by 16th century. Even today, many clocks and wristwatches have a resolution of only one minute. Thanks to all this, modern society still thinks of time divisions in this manner.
  1. science historian
  2. horologist
  3. science educator
  4. ancient historian
  5. Physics historian
Question 25 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Why does the author state that the word 'criminal doesn't have a clearly defied meaning'?

PASSAGE – II

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

There can be no sane discussion of "crime" and "criminals" without an investigation of the meaning of the words. A large majority of men, even among the educated, speak of a "criminal" as if the word had a clearly defined meaning. As a matter of fact, there is no such division, and from the nature of things, there never can be such a line.

Strictly speaking, a crime is an act forbidden by the law of the land, and one which is considered sufficiently serious to warrant providing penalties for its commission. It does not necessarily follow that this act is either good or bad; the punishment follows for the violation of the law and not necessarily for any moral transgression. No doubt most of the things forbidden by the penal code are such as are injurious to the organized society of the time and place, and are usually of such a character as for a long period of time, and in most countries, have been classed as criminal. But even then it does not always follow that the violator of the law is not a person of higher type than the majority who are directly and indirectly responsible for the law.

It is apparent that a thing is not necessarily bad because it is forbidden by the law. Legislators are forever repealing and abolishing criminal statutes, and organized society is constantly ignoring laws, until they fall into disuse and die. The laws against witchcraft, the long line of "blue laws," the laws affecting religious beliefs and many social customs, are well-known examples of legal and innocent acts which legislatures and courts had once made criminal. Not only are criminal statutes always dying by repeal or repeated violation, but every time a legislature meets, it changes penalties for existing crimes and makes criminal certain acts that were not forbidden before.

Judging from the kind of men sent to the State legislatures and to Central legislative body, the fact that certain things are forbidden does not mean that these things are necessarily evil; but rather, that politicians believe there is a demand for such legislation from the class of society that is most powerful in political action. No one who examines the question can be satisfied that a thing is intrinsically wrong because it is forbidden by a legislative body.
  1. Men cannot be divided by a distinct line into the criminal and the virtuous.
  2. As the laws are different for different places and times, 'criminals' cannot be defined.
  3. Legislators are forever repealing and abolishing criminal statutes; so there is no fixed definition of a criminal.
  4. It is amoral to label anybody a 'criminal'.
  5. Criminals are violators of the law but may be more virtuous than the persons responsible for the law.
Question 26 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The passage is primarily an attempt to

PASSAGE – III

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Why do we divide a minute into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, while there are only 24 hours in a day? Currently, the most prevalent numeral system is decimal (base 10), which possibly originated as it enabled easier counting with fingers. The civilizations that first split the day into smaller parts, nevertheless, used different numeral systems, notably duodecimal (base 12) and sexagesimal (base 60).

Most historians opine that the Egyptians were the first to divide the day into smaller parts. The first of the sundials they created were just stakes placed on the ground that indicated time by the length and direction of the resulting shadow. By 15th century B.C., they had developed a more advanced sundial. Without artificial light, humans at that time considered sunlit and dark periods to be two opposing realms. When sundials were used first, however, the Egyptians also first observed a group of 36 stars which divided the circle of the heavens. The clepsydra i.e. water clock, was also used to record time at night, and was perhaps the most accurate timekeeping device of its times.
Later the concept of a 24-hour day arose. The concept of fixed-length hours, however, originated in the Hellenistic period. Hipparchus proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours. Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours.

Hipparchus and other Greek scientists used astronomical techniques developed by the Babylonians. They made calculations in the sexagesimal (base 60) system. Although we do not know why 60 was chosen, it is convenient for expressing fractions, since it is the smallest number divisible by the first six counting numbers and also by 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

The Greek astronomer Eratosthenes used a sexagesimal system to divide a circle into 60 parts. Abou 100 years later, Hipparchus normalized the lines of latitude and also invented a system of longitude lines that encompassed 360 degrees. In his treatise Almagest, Ptolemy expanded Hipparchus' work by subdividing each of the 360 degrees of latitude and longitude. Each degree was divided into 60 parts, each subdivided into 60 parts. The first division, partes minutae primae, or first minute, became known as the "minute." The second segmentation, partes minutae secundae, or "second minute," became known as the second.

However, minutes and seconds, were not used for everyday timekeeping until many centuries. Clock displays split the hour into halves, thirds, quarters and sometimes even 12 parts, but never by 60. In fact, the hour was not commonly understood to be 60 minutes. It was not practical for the general public to consider minutes until the first mechanical displaying minutes appeared by 16th century. Even today, many clocks and wristwatches have a resolution of only one minute. Thanks to all this, modern society still thinks of time divisions in this manner.
  1. offer a tribute to the ancient Egyptian and Greek civilizations for their efforts in making timekeeping devices
  2. explain the history of scientific developments in the context of inventing timekeeping devices
  3. tell the reader why an hour contains 60 minutes, a minute 60 seconds and a day 24 hours
  4. explain the reasons behind the invention of different timekeeping devices
  5. Describe how the Greeks built on the earlier work done by the Babylonians in the context of developing timekeeping devices.
Question 27 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Why does the author believe that the punishment follows for the violation of the law and not for moral transgression?

PASSAGE – II

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

There can be no sane discussion of "crime" and "criminals" without an investigation of the meaning of the words. A large majority of men, even among the educated, speak of a "criminal" as if the word had a clearly defined meaning. As a matter of fact, there is no such division, and from the nature of things, there never can be such a line.

Strictly speaking, a crime is an act forbidden by the law of the land, and one which is considered sufficiently serious to warrant providing penalties for its commission. It does not necessarily follow that this act is either good or bad; the punishment follows for the violation of the law and not necessarily for any moral transgression. No doubt most of the things forbidden by the penal code are such as are injurious to the organized society of the time and place, and are usually of such a character as for a long period of time, and in most countries, have been classed as criminal. But even then it does not always follow that the violator of the law is not a person of higher type than the majority who are directly and indirectly responsible for the law.

It is apparent that a thing is not necessarily bad because it is forbidden by the law. Legislators are forever repealing and abolishing criminal statutes, and organized society is constantly ignoring laws, until they fall into disuse and die. The laws against witchcraft, the long line of "blue laws," the laws affecting religious beliefs and many social customs, are well-known examples of legal and innocent acts which legislatures and courts had once made criminal. Not only are criminal statutes always dying by repeal or repeated violation, but every time a legislature meets, it changes penalties for existing crimes and makes criminal certain acts that were not forbidden before.

Judging from the kind of men sent to the State legislatures and to Central legislative body, the fact that certain things are forbidden does not mean that these things are necessarily evil; but rather, that politicians believe there is a demand for such legislation from the class of society that is most powerful in political action. No one who examines the question can be satisfied that a thing is intrinsically wrong because it is forbidden by a legislative body.
  1. The criminal act may not be good or bad in itself.
  2. Moral laws should not be binding on the people.
  3. The violation is of utmost consequence and morality is secondary.
  4. Legality and morality don't go hand in hand.
Question 28 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is most correct in the context of the above passage?

PASSAGE – I

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations — novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/ 4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements.  Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families — 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.
  1. High-risk families often have a male carrying a sporadic mutation leading to autism.
  2. An individual having a functional disruption in a single gene, because the other copy has been deleted, is a very common occurrence.
  3. The unified genetic theory of autism combines elements from two different theories and gives an integrated picture.
  4. In case of families with multiple affected members, the males have a greater risk of being autistic as compared to females.
  5. None of these
Question 29 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The passage helps us answer which of the following questions?1. What was the reason behind choosing 60 as the basis of astronomical calculations?2. When did the use of minute start among the general populace?3. Did the Greeks build on others' work in timekeeping devices?4. What was the reason that the Egyptians started developing timekeeping devices?

Choose your answer from the following options.

PASSAGE – III

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Why do we divide a minute into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, while there are only 24 hours in a day? Currently, the most prevalent numeral system is decimal (base 10), which possibly originated as it enabled easier counting with fingers. The civilizations that first split the day into smaller parts, nevertheless, used different numeral systems, notably duodecimal (base 12) and sexagesimal (base 60).

Most historians opine that the Egyptians were the first to divide the day into smaller parts. The first of the sundials they created were just stakes placed on the ground that indicated time by the length and direction of the resulting shadow. By 15th century B.C., they had developed a more advanced sundial. Without artificial light, humans at that time considered sunlit and dark periods to be two opposing realms. When sundials were used first, however, the Egyptians also first observed a group of 36 stars which divided the circle of the heavens. The clepsydra i.e. water clock, was also used to record time at night, and was perhaps the most accurate timekeeping device of its times.
Later the concept of a 24-hour day arose. The concept of fixed-length hours, however, originated in the Hellenistic period. Hipparchus proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours. Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours.

Hipparchus and other Greek scientists used astronomical techniques developed by the Babylonians. They made calculations in the sexagesimal (base 60) system. Although we do not know why 60 was chosen, it is convenient for expressing fractions, since it is the smallest number divisible by the first six counting numbers and also by 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

The Greek astronomer Eratosthenes used a sexagesimal system to divide a circle into 60 parts. Abou 100 years later, Hipparchus normalized the lines of latitude and also invented a system of longitude lines that encompassed 360 degrees. In his treatise Almagest, Ptolemy expanded Hipparchus' work by subdividing each of the 360 degrees of latitude and longitude. Each degree was divided into 60 parts, each subdivided into 60 parts. The first division, partes minutae primae, or first minute, became known as the "minute." The second segmentation, partes minutae secundae, or "second minute," became known as the second.

However, minutes and seconds, were not used for everyday timekeeping until many centuries. Clock displays split the hour into halves, thirds, quarters and sometimes even 12 parts, but never by 60. In fact, the hour was not commonly understood to be 60 minutes. It was not practical for the general public to consider minutes until the first mechanical displaying minutes appeared by 16th century. Even today, many clocks and wristwatches have a resolution of only one minute. Thanks to all this, modern society still thinks of time divisions in this manner.
  1. 1 only
  2. 1, 2 and 3
  3. 2 and 3 only
  4. 2, 3 and 4
Question 30 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the central idea of the passage?

PASSAGE – II

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

There can be no sane discussion of "crime" and "criminals" without an investigation of the meaning of the words. A large majority of men, even among the educated, speak of a "criminal" as if the word had a clearly defined meaning. As a matter of fact, there is no such division, and from the nature of things, there never can be such a line.

Strictly speaking, a crime is an act forbidden by the law of the land, and one which is considered sufficiently serious to warrant providing penalties for its commission. It does not necessarily follow that this act is either good or bad; the punishment follows for the violation of the law and not necessarily for any moral transgression. No doubt most of the things forbidden by the penal code are such as are injurious to the organized society of the time and place, and are usually of such a character as for a long period of time, and in most countries, have been classed as criminal. But even then it does not always follow that the violator of the law is not a person of higher type than the majority who are directly and indirectly responsible for the law.

It is apparent that a thing is not necessarily bad because it is forbidden by the law. Legislators are forever repealing and abolishing criminal statutes, and organized society is constantly ignoring laws, until they fall into disuse and die. The laws against witchcraft, the long line of "blue laws," the laws affecting religious beliefs and many social customs, are well-known examples of legal and innocent acts which legislatures and courts had once made criminal. Not only are criminal statutes always dying by repeal or repeated violation, but every time a legislature meets, it changes penalties for existing crimes and makes criminal certain acts that were not forbidden before.

Judging from the kind of men sent to the State legislatures and to Central legislative body, the fact that certain things are forbidden does not mean that these things are necessarily evil; but rather, that politicians believe there is a demand for such legislation from the class of society that is most powerful in political action. No one who examines the question can be satisfied that a thing is intrinsically wrong because it is forbidden by a legislative body.
  1. The ruling class and the people with power decide the laws and the punishment.
  2. Morality and crime are two different things and a crime cannot be said to be amoral because the basis of the criminal statutes is not morality.
  3. Crime cannot be demarcated into good or bad, or right or wrong; it depends on the beliefs of the society prevalent at that time.
  4. Things that are forbidden are not necessarily evil and do not demand a punishment for the same; it depends more on the whims of the ruling class.
  5. Punishment follows for violation of the law and has nothing to do with morality.
Question 31 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The style of the passage cannot be faulted on all of the following grounds except

  1.     It does not exemplify the ideas presented.
    
  2.     It is full of too many details.
    
  3.     It is littered with jargon.
    

PASSAGE – IV

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage

It is evident that, in what is called the evolution of animal forms, the foot came in suddenly when the backboned creatures began to live on the dry land--that is, with the frogs. How it came in is a question which still puzzles the phylogenists, who cannot find a sure pedigree for the frog. There it is, anyhow, and the remarkable point about it is that the foot of a frog is not a rudimentary thing, but an authentic standard foot, like the yard measure kept in the Tower of London, of which all other feet are copies or adaptations. This instrument, as part of the original outfit given to the pioneers of the brainy, backboned, and four-limbed races, when they were sent out to multiply and replenish the earth, is surely worth considering well. It consists essentially of a sole, or palm, made up of small bones and of five separate digits, each with several joints.

In the hind foot of a frog the toes are very long and webbed from point to point. In this it differs a good deal from the toad, and there is significance in the difference. The "heavy-gaited toad," satisfied with sour ants, hard beetles, and such other fare as it can easily pick up, and grown nasty in consequence, so that nothing seeks to eat it, has hobbled through life, like a plethoric old gentleman, until the present day, on its original feet. The more versatile and nimble-witted frog, seeking better diet and greater security of life, went back to the element in which it was bred, and, swimming much, became better fitted for swimming. The soft elastic skin between the fingers or toes is just the sort of tissue which responds most readily to inward impulses, and we find that the very same change has come about in those birds and beasts which live much in water. I know that this is not the accepted theory of evolution, but I am waiting till it shall become so. We all develop in the direction of our tendencies, and shall, I doubt not, be wise enough some day to give animals leave to do the same.

When we pass from reptiles to birds, lo! an astounding thing has happened. That there were flying reptiles in the fossil ages we know, and there are flying beasts in our own. But the wings of these are simple mechanical alterations, which the imagination of a child, or a savage, could explain. The hands of a bat are hands still, and, though the fingers are hampered by their awkward gloves, the thumbs are free. The giant fruit bats of the tropics clamber about the trees quite acrobatically with their thumbs and feet. Here is a whole sub-kingdom, as they call it, of the animal world which has unreservedly and irrevocably bartered one pair of its limbs for a flying-machine. The apparatus is made of feathers--a new invention, unknown to amphibian or saurian, whence obtained nobody can say—and these are grafted into the transformed frame of the old limbs. The bargain was worth making, for the winged bird at once soared away in all senses from the creeping things of earth, and became a more ethereal being. But the price was heavy. The bird must get through life with one pair of feet and its mouth.

And let us note that the art of standing began with birds. Frogs sit, and, as far as I know, every reptile, be it lizard, crocodile, alligator, or tortoise, lays its body on the ground when not actually carrying it. And these have each four fat legs. Contrast the flamingo, which, having only two, and those like willow wands, tucks up one of them and sleeps poised high on the other, like a tulip on its stem. Note also that one toe has been altogether discarded by birds as superfluous. The germ, or bud, must be there, for the Dorking fowl has produced a fifth toe under some influence of the poultry-yard, but no natural bird has more than four. Except in swifts, which never perch, but cling to rocks and walls, one is turned backwards, and, by a cunning contrivance, the act of bending the leg draws them all automatically together. So a hen closes its toes at every step it takes, as if it grasped something, and, of course, when it settles down on its roost, they grasp that tight and hold it fast till morning. But to birds that do not perch this mechanism is only an encumbrance, so many of them, like the plovers, abolish the hind toe entirely, and the prince of all two-legged runners, the ostrich, has got rid of one of the front toes also, retaining only two.

  1. 1 and 3
  2. 2 and 3
  3. 2 only
  4. 3 only
  5. 1, 2 and 3
Question 32 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In terms of its nature, the passage could be characterized as which of the following?

PASSAGE – III

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Why do we divide a minute into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, while there are only 24 hours in a day? Currently, the most prevalent numeral system is decimal (base 10), which possibly originated as it enabled easier counting with fingers. The civilizations that first split the day into smaller parts, nevertheless, used different numeral systems, notably duodecimal (base 12) and sexagesimal (base 60).

Most historians opine that the Egyptians were the first to divide the day into smaller parts. The first of the sundials they created were just stakes placed on the ground that indicated time by the length and direction of the resulting shadow. By 15th century B.C., they had developed a more advanced sundial. Without artificial light, humans at that time considered sunlit and dark periods to be two opposing realms. When sundials were used first, however, the Egyptians also first observed a group of 36 stars which divided the circle of the heavens. The clepsydra i.e. water clock, was also used to record time at night, and was perhaps the most accurate timekeeping device of its times.
Later the concept of a 24-hour day arose. The concept of fixed-length hours, however, originated in the Hellenistic period. Hipparchus proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours. Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours.

Hipparchus and other Greek scientists used astronomical techniques developed by the Babylonians. They made calculations in the sexagesimal (base 60) system. Although we do not know why 60 was chosen, it is convenient for expressing fractions, since it is the smallest number divisible by the first six counting numbers and also by 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

The Greek astronomer Eratosthenes used a sexagesimal system to divide a circle into 60 parts. Abou 100 years later, Hipparchus normalized the lines of latitude and also invented a system of longitude lines that encompassed 360 degrees. In his treatise Almagest, Ptolemy expanded Hipparchus' work by subdividing each of the 360 degrees of latitude and longitude. Each degree was divided into 60 parts, each subdivided into 60 parts. The first division, partes minutae primae, or first minute, became known as the "minute." The second segmentation, partes minutae secundae, or "second minute," became known as the second.

However, minutes and seconds, were not used for everyday timekeeping until many centuries. Clock displays split the hour into halves, thirds, quarters and sometimes even 12 parts, but never by 60. In fact, the hour was not commonly understood to be 60 minutes. It was not practical for the general public to consider minutes until the first mechanical displaying minutes appeared by 16th century. Even today, many clocks and wristwatches have a resolution of only one minute. Thanks to all this, modern society still thinks of time divisions in this manner.
  1. Analytical
  2. Descriptive
  3. Syllogistic
  4. Normative
  5. Well-reasoned
Question 33 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In the above passage, the author basically discusses

PASSAGE – IV

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage

It is evident that, in what is called the evolution of animal forms, the foot came in suddenly when the backboned creatures began to live on the dry land--that is, with the frogs. How it came in is a question which still puzzles the phylogenists, who cannot find a sure pedigree for the frog. There it is, anyhow, and the remarkable point about it is that the foot of a frog is not a rudimentary thing, but an authentic standard foot, like the yard measure kept in the Tower of London, of which all other feet are copies or adaptations. This instrument, as part of the original outfit given to the pioneers of the brainy, backboned, and four-limbed races, when they were sent out to multiply and replenish the earth, is surely worth considering well. It consists essentially of a sole, or palm, made up of small bones and of five separate digits, each with several joints.

In the hind foot of a frog the toes are very long and webbed from point to point. In this it differs a good deal from the toad, and there is significance in the difference. The "heavy-gaited toad," satisfied with sour ants, hard beetles, and such other fare as it can easily pick up, and grown nasty in consequence, so that nothing seeks to eat it, has hobbled through life, like a plethoric old gentleman, until the present day, on its original feet. The more versatile and nimble-witted frog, seeking better diet and greater security of life, went back to the element in which it was bred, and, swimming much, became better fitted for swimming. The soft elastic skin between the fingers or toes is just the sort of tissue which responds most readily to inward impulses, and we find that the very same change has come about in those birds and beasts which live much in water. I know that this is not the accepted theory of evolution, but I am waiting till it shall become so. We all develop in the direction of our tendencies, and shall, I doubt not, be wise enough some day to give animals leave to do the same.

When we pass from reptiles to birds, lo! an astounding thing has happened. That there were flying reptiles in the fossil ages we know, and there are flying beasts in our own. But the wings of these are simple mechanical alterations, which the imagination of a child, or a savage, could explain. The hands of a bat are hands still, and, though the fingers are hampered by their awkward gloves, the thumbs are free. The giant fruit bats of the tropics clamber about the trees quite acrobatically with their thumbs and feet. Here is a whole sub-kingdom, as they call it, of the animal world which has unreservedly and irrevocably bartered one pair of its limbs for a flying-machine. The apparatus is made of feathers--a new invention, unknown to amphibian or saurian, whence obtained nobody can say—and these are grafted into the transformed frame of the old limbs. The bargain was worth making, for the winged bird at once soared away in all senses from the creeping things of earth, and became a more ethereal being. But the price was heavy. The bird must get through life with one pair of feet and its mouth.

And let us note that the art of standing began with birds. Frogs sit, and, as far as I know, every reptile, be it lizard, crocodile, alligator, or tortoise, lays its body on the ground when not actually carrying it. And these have each four fat legs. Contrast the flamingo, which, having only two, and those like willow wands, tucks up one of them and sleeps poised high on the other, like a tulip on its stem. Note also that one toe has been altogether discarded by birds as superfluous. The germ, or bud, must be there, for the Dorking fowl has produced a fifth toe under some influence of the poultry-yard, but no natural bird has more than four. Except in swifts, which never perch, but cling to rocks and walls, one is turned backwards, and, by a cunning contrivance, the act of bending the leg draws them all automatically together. So a hen closes its toes at every step it takes, as if it grasped something, and, of course, when it settles down on its roost, they grasp that tight and hold it fast till morning. But to birds that do not perch this mechanism is only an encumbrance, so many of them, like the plovers, abolish the hind toe entirely, and the prince of all two-legged runners, the ostrich, has got rid of one of the front toes also, retaining only two.

  1. the evolution of reptiles and birds in the context of the overall process of animal evolution
  2. the evolution of organs of movement within the animal kingdom as a whole
  3. the idea of how frogs and toads have overcome various barriers to their successful evolution
  4. the importance of the development of feet for frogs and birds
  5. the evolution of organs of movement within the animal kingdom as a whole, with special reference to the frog, toad and birds
Question 34 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following would be unjustified in the context of the above passage?

PASSAGE – III

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Why do we divide a minute into 60 seconds, an hour into 60 minutes, while there are only 24 hours in a day? Currently, the most prevalent numeral system is decimal (base 10), which possibly originated as it enabled easier counting with fingers. The civilizations that first split the day into smaller parts, nevertheless, used different numeral systems, notably duodecimal (base 12) and sexagesimal (base 60).

Most historians opine that the Egyptians were the first to divide the day into smaller parts. The first of the sundials they created were just stakes placed on the ground that indicated time by the length and direction of the resulting shadow. By 15th century B.C., they had developed a more advanced sundial. Without artificial light, humans at that time considered sunlit and dark periods to be two opposing realms. When sundials were used first, however, the Egyptians also first observed a group of 36 stars which divided the circle of the heavens. The clepsydra i.e. water clock, was also used to record time at night, and was perhaps the most accurate timekeeping device of its times.
Later the concept of a 24-hour day arose. The concept of fixed-length hours, however, originated in the Hellenistic period. Hipparchus proposed dividing the day into 24 equinoctial hours. Despite this suggestion, laypeople continued to use seasonally varying hours.

Hipparchus and other Greek scientists used astronomical techniques developed by the Babylonians. They made calculations in the sexagesimal (base 60) system. Although we do not know why 60 was chosen, it is convenient for expressing fractions, since it is the smallest number divisible by the first six counting numbers and also by 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30.

The Greek astronomer Eratosthenes used a sexagesimal system to divide a circle into 60 parts. Abou 100 years later, Hipparchus normalized the lines of latitude and also invented a system of longitude lines that encompassed 360 degrees. In his treatise Almagest, Ptolemy expanded Hipparchus' work by subdividing each of the 360 degrees of latitude and longitude. Each degree was divided into 60 parts, each subdivided into 60 parts. The first division, partes minutae primae, or first minute, became known as the "minute." The second segmentation, partes minutae secundae, or "second minute," became known as the second.

However, minutes and seconds, were not used for everyday timekeeping until many centuries. Clock displays split the hour into halves, thirds, quarters and sometimes even 12 parts, but never by 60. In fact, the hour was not commonly understood to be 60 minutes. It was not practical for the general public to consider minutes until the first mechanical displaying minutes appeared by 16th century. Even today, many clocks and wristwatches have a resolution of only one minute. Thanks to all this, modern society still thinks of time divisions in this manner.
  1. The Babylonians were inspired by the Egyptians in their efforts to develop timekeeping devices.
  2. To a great extent, the credit for developing a fairly modern system of timekeeping should go to the Greeks.
  3. The concept of a fixed length day was started by the Greeks.
  4. The sundial was probably a primitive timekeeping device as compared to other devices invented by the Egyptians.
  5. The ease of counting with fingers is possibly the reasons for our adopting the decimal system as a base.
Question 35 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following inferences cannot be drawn from the above selection?

  1.     The author's idea about the development of soft tissue on the feet of birds is open to question.
    
  2.     The toad is rarely eaten, if at all, by predators.
    
  3.     The frog's original home, at the time of birth, was the water bodies.
    

PASSAGE – IV

The passage is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage

It is evident that, in what is called the evolution of animal forms, the foot came in suddenly when the backboned creatures began to live on the dry land--that is, with the frogs. How it came in is a question which still puzzles the phylogenists, who cannot find a sure pedigree for the frog. There it is, anyhow, and the remarkable point about it is that the foot of a frog is not a rudimentary thing, but an authentic standard foot, like the yard measure kept in the Tower of London, of which all other feet are copies or adaptations. This instrument, as part of the original outfit given to the pioneers of the brainy, backboned, and four-limbed races, when they were sent out to multiply and replenish the earth, is surely worth considering well. It consists essentially of a sole, or palm, made up of small bones and of five separate digits, each with several joints.

In the hind foot of a frog the toes are very long and webbed from point to point. In this it differs a good deal from the toad, and there is significance in the difference. The "heavy-gaited toad," satisfied with sour ants, hard beetles, and such other fare as it can easily pick up, and grown nasty in consequence, so that nothing seeks to eat it, has hobbled through life, like a plethoric old gentleman, until the present day, on its original feet. The more versatile and nimble-witted frog, seeking better diet and greater security of life, went back to the element in which it was bred, and, swimming much, became better fitted for swimming. The soft elastic skin between the fingers or toes is just the sort of tissue which responds most readily to inward impulses, and we find that the very same change has come about in those birds and beasts which live much in water. I know that this is not the accepted theory of evolution, but I am waiting till it shall become so. We all develop in the direction of our tendencies, and shall, I doubt not, be wise enough some day to give animals leave to do the same.

When we pass from reptiles to birds, lo! an astounding thing has happened. That there were flying reptiles in the fossil ages we know, and there are flying beasts in our own. But the wings of these are simple mechanical alterations, which the imagination of a child, or a savage, could explain. The hands of a bat are hands still, and, though the fingers are hampered by their awkward gloves, the thumbs are free. The giant fruit bats of the tropics clamber about the trees quite acrobatically with their thumbs and feet. Here is a whole sub-kingdom, as they call it, of the animal world which has unreservedly and irrevocably bartered one pair of its limbs for a flying-machine. The apparatus is made of feathers--a new invention, unknown to amphibian or saurian, whence obtained nobody can say—and these are grafted into the transformed frame of the old limbs. The bargain was worth making, for the winged bird at once soared away in all senses from the creeping things of earth, and became a more ethereal being. But the price was heavy. The bird must get through life with one pair of feet and its mouth.

And let us note that the art of standing began with birds. Frogs sit, and, as far as I know, every reptile, be it lizard, crocodile, alligator, or tortoise, lays its body on the ground when not actually carrying it. And these have each four fat legs. Contrast the flamingo, which, having only two, and those like willow wands, tucks up one of them and sleeps poised high on the other, like a tulip on its stem. Note also that one toe has been altogether discarded by birds as superfluous. The germ, or bud, must be there, for the Dorking fowl has produced a fifth toe under some influence of the poultry-yard, but no natural bird has more than four. Except in swifts, which never perch, but cling to rocks and walls, one is turned backwards, and, by a cunning contrivance, the act of bending the leg draws them all automatically together. So a hen closes its toes at every step it takes, as if it grasped something, and, of course, when it settles down on its roost, they grasp that tight and hold it fast till morning. But to birds that do not perch this mechanism is only an encumbrance, so many of them, like the plovers, abolish the hind toe entirely, and the prince of all two-legged runners, the ostrich, has got rid of one of the front toes also, retaining only two.

  1. 1 only
  2. 2, 3
  3. 3 only
  4. 2 only
  5. All of them are valid

Practice this chapter

Reading Comprehension (7656 questions)