Application threat modeling Quiz - 1
| Description: Application threat modeling, Security, Security tools and best practices | |
| Number of Questions: 19 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: security technology |
-
MITM proxy can be used to change the URL to a non secured one
-
If the login page is not SSL enabled, the credentials will be transmitted in plain text to the web server and Attacker can sniff the credentials supplied by the user
-
Firewall logs will have the credentials in plain text
-
proxy logs will have the credentials in plain text
To develop an application that includes both secured and non-secured web pages, it is important to have the login page SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) enabled in order to protect sensitive user information. The SSL protocol is used to establish a secure and encrypted connection between the user's web browser and the web server.
Now, let's go through each option and explain why it is right or wrong:
A. MITM proxy can be used to change the URL to a non-secured one - This option is a possible security vulnerability. A Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack can be used to intercept the user's traffic and redirect them to a non-secured URL. However, enabling SSL on the login page does not directly mitigate this threat.
B. If the login page is not SSL enabled, the credentials will be transmitted in plain text to the web server and Attacker can sniff the credentials supplied by the user - This option is correct. If the login page is not SSL enabled, the credentials supplied by the user will be transmitted in plain text, which can be sniffed by attackers. This can lead to sensitive information such as usernames and passwords being compromised.
C. Firewall logs will have the credentials in plain text - This option is incorrect. Enabling SSL on the login page does not directly affect the firewall logs. Firewall logs can capture network traffic, including login credentials, regardless of whether SSL is enabled or not.
D. Proxy logs will have the credentials in plain text - This option is also correct. If SSL is not enabled on the login page, the credentials supplied by the user will be transmitted in plain text, which can be captured by proxies. This can lead to sensitive information such as usernames and passwords being compromised.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
The Answer is: B. If the login page is not SSL enabled, the credentials will be transmitted in plain text to the web server and attacker can sniff the credentials supplied by the user.
-
During multi-staged login, the application should validate the credentials supplied at each stage only
-
Hidden variables should be used to remember the previous stage values and current stage supplier credentials to be validated at server end
-
During multi-staged login, the application should validate the credentials supplied at each stage and previous stages
-
Credentials supplied at the prevoius stage should be saved in cookie and current stage supplier credentials to be validated at server end
To ensure application security during multi-staged login in an application, the developer should ensure that the credentials supplied at each stage are validated before moving to the next stage.
Option A states that the application should validate the credentials supplied at each stage only. This option is partially correct. Validation of credentials at each stage is necessary, but validating only at each stage is not enough. It is important to validate the credentials of previous stages as well to ensure security.
Option B suggests that hidden variables should be used to remember the previous stage values and current stage supplier credentials to be validated at the server end. Hidden variables can be used to store data, but they do not guarantee security. Attackers can access and modify hidden variables, which can lead to security vulnerabilities.
Option C is the correct answer. During multi-staged login, the application should validate the credentials supplied at each stage and previous stages. This ensures that all supplied credentials are correct and valid before allowing access to the application.
Option D suggests that credentials supplied at the previous stage should be saved in a cookie and current stage supplier credentials to be validated at the server end. Saving credentials in cookies can also lead to security vulnerabilities as attackers can access and modify cookies.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
The Answer is: C. During multi-staged login, the application should validate the credentials supplied at each stage and previous stages.
-
XSS
-
Reflection Attack
-
Mirror Attack
-
XSLT
-
Dynamic File Attack
-
Remote File Inclusion
-
Dynamic Data Attack
-
Data Dynamics
-
Static Code Analysis is the analysis of software code by actually executing the binaries resulting from this code
-
Static Code Analysis is the analysis of software code without actually executing the binaries resulting from this code
-
Static Code Analysis is the analysis of executables resulting from this code
-
None of the above
The process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector that could exploit it is known as
-
Anti Patching
-
Anti Attack
-
Virtual Patching
-
Patch Attack
AI Explanation
To answer this question, you need to understand the concept of addressing security vulnerabilities.
Option A) Anti Patching - This option is incorrect because "anti patching" does not describe the process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector.
Option B) Anti Attack - This option is incorrect because "anti attack" does not specifically refer to the process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector.
Option C) Virtual Patching - This option is correct because virtual patching refers to the process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector that could exploit it. Virtual patching involves implementing temporary security measures to protect against known vulnerabilities while a proper patch or fix is being developed and deployed.
Option D) Patch Attack - This option is incorrect because "patch attack" does not accurately describe the process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector.
The correct answer is C) Virtual Patching. This option is correct because it accurately describes the process of addressing a security vulnerability by blocking an attack vector that could exploit it.
-
Web Applictation Firewall
-
Application Based Intrusion Detection
-
Database Monitoring
-
Virtual Private Lan
ModSecurity is a popular
-
Web Applictation Firewall
-
Application Based Intrusion Detection
-
Database Monitoring
-
Virtual Private Lan
Any attack which is based on information gained from physical implementation of a crypto system,rather than brute force or algorithm weakness is known as
-
Back Attack
-
Unknown Attack
-
Reverse Attack
-
Side Channel Attack
AI Explanation
To answer this question, we need to understand the concept of side channel attacks.
Option A) Back Attack - This option is incorrect because there is no specific attack known as a "back attack" in the context of cryptography.
Option B) Unknown Attack - This option is incorrect because the term "unknown attack" does not specifically refer to attacks based on information gained from the physical implementation of a crypto system.
Option C) Reverse Attack - This option is incorrect because the term "reverse attack" does not specifically refer to attacks based on information gained from the physical implementation of a crypto system.
Option D) Side Channel Attack - This option is correct. A side channel attack is an attack on a cryptographic system that is based on information gained from the physical implementation of the system, rather than relying on brute force or algorithm weaknesses. Side channel attacks exploit unintended side effects of a system's implementation, such as timing information, power consumption, electromagnetic radiation, or sound, to gain information about the secret key or plaintext.
The correct answer is D) Side Channel Attack. This option is correct because it accurately describes an attack that is based on information gained from the physical implementation of a crypto system.
-
Previlged User Monitoring
-
Application Activity Monitoring
-
Cyberattack Protection
-
Database Recovery
-
DREAD
-
FEAR
-
SAFE
-
DEAF
-
STRIDE
-
PRIDE
-
BRIDE
-
RIDE
If an attacker submit multiple input parameters (query string, post data, cookies,etc.) of the same name, the application may react in unexpected ways and open up new avenues of server-side and client-side exploitation.This is the premise of
-
HTTP Parameter Pollution
-
Session Splitting
-
Parameter Damage
-
Parameter Busting
To solve this question, the user needs to understand the concept of security vulnerabilities related to web applications.
The correct answer is A. HTTP Parameter Pollution.
Explanation:
HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP) is a security vulnerability that arises when an attacker submits multiple input parameters of the same name to a web application. This can lead to unexpected behaviors on the server-side and client-side, which can then be exploited by attackers to achieve their goals.
Option B, Session Splitting, is not related to the given premise. Session Splitting is a technique used to distribute user sessions across multiple servers to improve performance and scalability.
Option C, Parameter Damage, is not a commonly used term in the field of web application security. It is not related to the given premise.
Option D, Parameter Busting, is not a commonly used term in the field of web application security. It is not related to the given premise.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
The Answer is: A. HTTP Parameter Pollution.
What is a an Evercookie?
-
Evercookie is a javascript API available that produces extremely persistent cookies in a browser
-
Evercookie is a cookie anonymysing tool
-
Evercookie is a FireFox Plugin
-
Evercookie is a cookie pollution tool
AI Explanation
To answer this question, you need to understand what an Evercookie is.
Option A) Evercookie is a javascript API available that produces extremely persistent cookies in a browser - This option is correct. An Evercookie is a JavaScript API that is designed to produce extremely persistent cookies in a web browser. It uses various techniques to store cookie data in multiple locations, making it difficult to remove or delete these cookies.
Option B) Evercookie is a cookie anonymizing tool - This option is incorrect. Evercookie is not a cookie anonymizing tool. It is a tool that creates persistent cookies.
Option C) Evercookie is a Firefox Plugin - This option is incorrect. Evercookie is not a Firefox plugin. It is a JavaScript API that works on multiple web browsers.
Option D) Evercookie is a cookie pollution tool - This option is incorrect. Evercookie is not a cookie pollution tool. It is a tool that creates persistent cookies.
The correct answer is A) Evercookie is a javascript API available that produces extremely persistent cookies in a browser. This option is correct because an Evercookie is a JavaScript API that creates persistent cookies in a web browser.
-
Padding Oracle Attack
-
Padding CBC Attack
-
Oracle Lockback
-
Padding Filter
-
Safe APIs
-
Banned APIs
-
String APIs
-
CAPIs
_________is a free static code analysis tool from Microsoft that checks .NET managed code assemblies for conformance to Microsoft's .NET Framework Design Guidelines
-
MsCop
-
FxCop
-
RsCop
-
DxCop
AI Explanation
To answer this question, you need to be familiar with the static code analysis tool provided by Microsoft for checking .NET managed code assemblies against the .NET Framework Design Guidelines.
Option A) MsCop - This option is incorrect because there is no known tool called "MsCop" provided by Microsoft for static code analysis.
Option B) FxCop - This option is correct. FxCop is a free static code analysis tool from Microsoft that checks .NET managed code assemblies for conformance to Microsoft's .NET Framework Design Guidelines.
Option C) RsCop - This option is incorrect because there is no known tool called "RsCop" provided by Microsoft for static code analysis.
Option D) DxCop - This option is incorrect because there is no known tool called "DxCop" provided by Microsoft for static code analysis.
The correct answer is B) FxCop. This option is correct because FxCop is the free static code analysis tool from Microsoft that checks .NET managed code assemblies for conformance to Microsoft's .NET Framework Design Guidelines.
-
Compiler
-
Reverse Engineering tool
-
Database Monitoring tool
-
Macro Analyzer
NOP sled technique is a popular
-
Reverse Engineering Technique
-
Buffer Overflow Attack Technique
-
Log Analysing Technique
-
Data Analysis Technique
AI Explanation
To answer this question, you need to understand the NOP sled technique and its purpose.
The NOP sled technique is a popular technique used in buffer overflow attacks.
A buffer overflow attack occurs when a program or system tries to store more data in a buffer than it was designed to hold. This can lead to the overwriting of adjacent memory locations, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code or take control of the system.
In a buffer overflow attack, the attacker injects malicious code into a buffer, and then overwrites the return address of a function with the address of the injected code. However, it can be challenging to precisely locate the injected code's address, especially if the buffer's size is not known.
This is where the NOP sled technique comes into play. NOP stands for "no operation," which is a type of instruction that does nothing when executed. The NOP sled is a long sequence of NOP instructions placed before the injected code. When the buffer overflow occurs, the execution flow will slide down the NOP sled until it reaches the injected code. This technique increases the chances of hitting the injected code's address, even if the exact location is not known.
Therefore, the correct answer is B) Buffer Overflow Attack Technique, as the NOP sled technique is commonly used in buffer overflow attacks.