To answer this question, you need to understand the coding scheme used for the layout of the European Central Bank (ECB).

The coding scheme for the layout of the ECB is based on a three-letter code. Each letter represents a specific location or function within the ECB.

Let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) WA0AA - This option does not match the coding scheme used for the layout of the ECB. The letters used do not represent any specific location or function within the ECB.

Option B) EB0EB - This option matches the coding scheme used for the layout of the ECB. The letters "EB" represent the European Central Bank, and the number "0" represents the main office or headquarters.

Option C) MI0MI - This option does not match the coding scheme used for the layout of the ECB. The letters used do not represent any specific location or function within the ECB.

Option D) CA0CAL - This option does not match the coding scheme used for the layout of the ECB. The letters used do not represent any specific location or function within the ECB.

The correct answer is B) EB0EB. This option is correct because it matches the coding scheme used for the layout of the ECB, with "EB" representing the European Central Bank and "0" representing the main office or headquarters.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand the concept of COMP-3, which is a binary-coded decimal (BCD) representation used in mainframe computers.

In COMP-3, each decimal digit is represented by a nibble (4 bits), and the sign is stored in the last nibble. The maximum length of a field defined using COMP-3 is determined by the number of bytes required to store the digits and the sign.

To calculate the maximum length, you need to consider the following:

• Each byte can store two decimal digits.
• The sign is stored in the last nibble, which requires an additional half byte.

Now, let's go through each option to determine the correct answer:

Option A) 10 Bytes - This option is correct. With 10 bytes, you can store 20 decimal digits and the sign (1/2 byte). This is the maximum length for a field defined using COMP-3.

Option B) 12 Bytes - This option is incorrect. With 12 bytes, you can store 24 decimal digits and the sign (1/2 byte), which exceeds the maximum length for a COMP-3 field.

Option C) 14 Bytes - This option is incorrect. With 14 bytes, you can store 28 decimal digits and the sign (1/2 byte), which exceeds the maximum length for a COMP-3 field.

Option D) 16 Bytes - This option is incorrect. With 16 bytes, you can store 32 decimal digits and the sign (1/2 byte), which exceeds the maximum length for a COMP-3 field.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option A) 10 Bytes. This option is correct because it represents the maximum length for a field defined using COMP-3, allowing you to store 20 decimal digits and the sign.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the purpose of the STOP RUN statement and the GO BACK statement in COBOL.

The STOP RUN statement is used to terminate the execution of a COBOL program. It stops the program and releases any resources used by the program. This statement is typically placed at the end of the program.

The GO BACK statement is used to transfer control back to the calling program or system. It is typically used in a program that is called by another program or system.

Now, let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) Nothing, the program will behave normally. This option is incorrect because the GO BACK statement is not designed to terminate the program. Instead, it transfers control back to the calling program or system. Without a STOP RUN statement, the program will not terminate properly.

Option B) The program will go in an infinite loop. This option is correct. If you use the GO BACK statement instead of the STOP RUN statement in a standalone COBOL program, the program will not terminate and will enter an infinite loop. This is because the program will keep going back to the calling program or system without a proper termination statement.

Option C) The program will not get compiled. This option is incorrect. The presence of the GO BACK statement instead of the STOP RUN statement does not affect the compilation of the COBOL program. The program will still compile successfully.

Option D) Output files won't be generated. This option is incorrect. The presence of the GO BACK statement instead of the STOP RUN statement does not affect the generation of output files in a COBOL program. The program will still generate output files if the necessary file handling statements are included.

Therefore, the correct answer is B) The program will go in an infinite loop. This option is correct because the GO BACK statement does not terminate the program, leading to an infinite loop.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the PIC (Picture) clause in COBOL, which is used to define the data type and format of a field.

In COBOL, the PIC 9.99 and 9v99 are different data types with different formats:

PIC 9.99 - This is a FOUR-POSITION field. The "9" represents a numeric digit, and the ".99" represents two decimal places.

9v99 - This is a THREE-POSITION field. The "9" represents a numeric digit, and the "v99" represents two decimal places.

Let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) PIC 9.99 is a THREE-POSITION field whereas PIC 9v99 is a FOUR-POSITION numeric field. This option is incorrect because the statement is reversed. PIC 9.99 is a FOUR-POSITION field, not THREE-POSITION.

Option B) No difference. This option is incorrect because there is a difference in the number of positions.

Option C) PIC 9.99 is a FOUR-POSITION field whereas PIC 9v99 is a THREE-POSITION numeric field. This option is correct. As explained above, PIC 9.99 is a FOUR-POSITION field, and PIC 9v99 is a THREE-POSITION field.

Option D) PIC 9.99 takes less space than PIC 9v99. This option is incorrect because both PIC 9.99 and 9v99 have the same number of decimal places and take the same amount of space.

The correct answer is C) PIC 9.99 is a FOUR-POSITION field whereas PIC 9v99 is a THREE-POSITION numeric field.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand how to handle abends (abnormal ends) in JCL (Job Control Language).

Option A) Use IF ABEND statement in the JCL - This option is correct. The IF ABEND statement in JCL allows you to specify a condition to check for specific abend codes and take appropriate actions, such as executing a specific job step or terminating the job. By using the IF ABEND statement, you can trap abends and handle them accordingly.

Option B) Use COND - This option is incorrect. The COND parameter in JCL is used to specify conditions for the execution of a job step based on the completion status of previous steps, not specifically for trapping abends.

Option C) Both a and b - This option is incorrect. Although option A is correct, option B is not an appropriate method for trapping abends.

Option D) None - This option is incorrect. Option A is a valid method for trapping abends in JCL.

The correct answer is A) Use IF ABEND statement in the JCL. This option is correct because it allows you to specify conditions to trap specific abend codes and take appropriate actions.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation