Law (UGC/NET Paper II & III)
Comprehensive law quiz covering constitutional law, international law, criminal law, contract law, family law, labour law, and tort law for UGC/NET Paper II & III preparation
Questions
The purpose of the United Nations are:
(i) To maintain International Peace and Security
(ii) To establish World Government
(iii) To develop friendly relations among Member States
(iv) To secure International cooperation in solving problems of social. economic and humanitarian character.
Of these following are correct:
- (i), (ii) and (iii)
- (ii), (iii) and (iv)
- (ii) and (iii)
- (i), (iii) and (iv)
Monism and dualism theories are:
- Complementary to each other
- Different from each other
- Similar to each other
- None of the above
Given below are two statements one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R) Match the correct.
Assertion (A): International law is not a law.
Reason (R): States do not accept international law.
- Both (A) and (R) are true.
- (A) is true, but (R) is wrong.
- (A) is wrong, but (R) is false.
- (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Which of the followings is not condition for a marriage under section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
- Neither should have a spouse living
- If the bride is below 18, consent of her guardian has been obtained
- They are not within prohibited degrees of relationship
- Neither should be subject to recurrent attack of ephilepsy
Consider the following Judgements of the Supreme Court, which dealt with the appointment and transfer of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts:
(i) S.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India
- (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (ii) (i) (iii) (iv)
- (ii) (i) (iv) (iii)
- (i) (ii) (ii) (iii)
Where a contract contains a stipulation by way of penalty on breach of contract, the aggrieved party is entitled for compensation:
- Stipulated amount, if actual loss is proved
- Stipulated amount, even actual loss is not proved
- Reasonable amount but not more than stipulated amount
- Reasonable amount, even more than stipulated amount if loss is proved
Respondent superior 'means
- respondent is superior than plaintiff
- master is superior
- servant is not liable
- master is vicariously liable
Consider the following decisions on the meaning of the employer under section 2 (g) of the industrial Disputes Act. Identify the correct order in which they appeared:
(i) Bombay Dock Labour Board Vs. Stevedone workers
(ii) Western India Automobile Association Vs. Industrial Tribunal
(iii) Kays Construction Co (P) Ltd. Vs. Its work men
(iv) Anakapalle cooperative Agricultural and Industrial Society Vs. Its workmen
- (ii) (iv) (iii) (i)
- (iii) (ii) (i) (iv)
- (ii) (i) (iii) (iv)
- (i) (iii) (iv) (ii)
Which one of the following jurists opined that crime is an act or omission in violation of public rights?
- Pollock
- Austin
- Blackburn
- Willam Gla
Arrage the sequence of the following events in which they occur in a contract, using the code:
(i) Communication of offer
(ii) Inviation of offer
(iii) Fraud
(iv) Damages
- (ii) (i) (iii) (iv)
- (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (iv) (ii) (i) (iii)
- (iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that 'the members of nonrecognised union cannot be represented in collective bargaining proceedings or individual grievances of its members'.
- Chairman, Bank of India Vs. All Orissa State Bank Officers Association (2003) 3 ILJ 751 (S.C.)
- W. Willard Wirtz Vs. Hotel and Club Employees Union, AIR 1969 SC 25
- Indian Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen, AIR 1969 SC 306
- None of the above
Which of the following statement is correct?
- Sec. 34 of l.P.C. is only a rule of evidence.
- Sec .34 of I.P.C. does not create a substantive offence.
- Both 1 and 2 are correct.
- None of these
Match the following words with their correct Article from codes given below:
| List - I |
| <b>List - II</b>
|
| (a) Freedom of association
| (i) Article 14
|
| (b) Right of reservation
| (ii) Article 21
|
| (c) Right of livelihood
| (iii) Article 19
|
| (d) Right of habeas corpus
| (iv) Article 22
|
- (a)-(i), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(iv)
- (a)-(i), (b)-(iii), (c)-(ii), (d)-(iv)
- (a)-(iii), (b)-(i), (c)-(ii), (d)-(iv)
- (a)-(iv), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(i)
Fundamental Rights are
- Unrestricted Rights
- Absolute Rights
- Restricted Rights
- None of the above
The Nauiila Incident relates to:
- Obstruction of ships
- Reprisals
- Retorsion
- Embargo
Assertion (A) : Break down of marriage as such is not a ground for divorce.
Reason (R) : It may result into an easy way of dissolution of marriage and shall result into instability in the society.
- Both (A) and (R) are correct.
- (A) is correct but (R) is incorrect.
- Both (A) and (R) are wrong.
- (R) is correct but (A) is wrong.
Ignorantia tacit doth excusat means:
- Ignorance of law is no excuse
- Ignorance of law is an excuse in certain cases
- Ignorance of fact is an excuse
- Ignorance of law and fact both are excusable
Match the List - I and List - Il using following code:
| List - I |
| <b>List - Il</b>
|
| (a) Registration of Marriage
| (i) S. 112 Evidence Act
|
| (b) Presumption of Marriage
| (ii) S. 7 HM Act
|
| (c) Presumption of legitimacy of child
| (iii) S. 114 Evidence Act
|
| (d) Marriage religious ceremonies
| (iv) Section 8 HM Act
|
- (a)-(i), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(iv)
- (a)-(iv), (b)-(iii), (c)-(i), (d)-(ii)
- (a)-(iii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(ii), (d)-(i)
- (a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(i)
In which of the following cases the plea of sovereign immunity can be taken:
- Army truck injuring a pedestrian
- Police constable firing at a religious gathering
- Chief of Army Staff ordering war action
- An M.P. making a defamatory statement in a press-meet
Match List-I with List-Il and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:
| List-I |
| <b>List-Il</b>
|
| I. Right to go abroad
| 1. Olga Tellis's case
|
| II. Right to livelihood
| 2. Mohini Jams case
|
| III. Right against sexual harassment
| 3. Menaka Gandhi's case
|
| IV. Right to education
| 4. Vishakas case
|
- I - 4, II - 2, III - 1, IV - 3
- I - 2, II - 3, III - 4, IV - 1
- I - 3, II - 1, III - 4, IV - 2
- I - 2, II - 1, III - 3, IV - 4
Where no form of marriage was gone through under section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the marriage is:
- Valid
- Voidable
- Void
- ineffective
In which of the following Cases it is well established that, any settlement between the employer and with one or more concerned union in a conciliation proceeding would bind all other workmen unions who were not made parties to the settlement:
- Ramnagar Cane and Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Jatin Chakravarthy
- Shanbhu Nath Goel Vs. Bank of Baroda
- Workers of Dimakuchi Tea Estate Vs. Management of Dimakuchi
- None of these
Assertion (A) : X and Y had independently entertained the idea to kill Z. Accordingly, each separately inflicts wounds on Z. Z dies. X and Y can be tried jointly.
Reason (R) : Two or more persons can be tried jointly if the act, resulting in an offence, is done in furtherance of a common intention. Select your answer using the codes given below:
- Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (A) is true but (R) is false
- (A) is false but (R) is true
Match List - I and List - II using the codes given below:
| List - I (Industry) |
| <b>List - II (Judicial decision)</b>
|
| (a) Cooperatives
| (i) Corporation of city of Nagpur case
|
| (b) Charitable Institution
| (ii) Prabhudayal Vs. Alwar Shakari Bhurni Vikas
|
| (c) Educational Institution run by a corporation
| (iii) Ramkrishna lyvar Vaidyanathan Vs. Fifth Industrial Tribunal
|
| (d) Chartered accountants
| (ii) Bombay pinjarapole case
|
- (a)-(iv), (b)-(i), (c)-(ii), (d)-(iii)
- (a)-(iii), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(i)
- (a)-(ii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(i), (d)-(iii)
- (a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(i), (d)-(iv)
Which of the following Articles of the constitution of India provide for circumstances under which parliament has power to make a law on any subject enumerated in the state list?
- 249, 250, 252 and 253
- 248, 249, 250 and 252
- 249, 250, 251 and 252
- 245, 246, 248 and 249