Home › Quizzes › Indian Evidence Act - 2

Indian Evidence Act - 2

Indian Evidence Act - 2

15 Questions Published
Play Quiz Practise this topic out loud

Questions

Question 1 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Section 114 of Evidence Act applies to

  1. admissibility of facts
  2. relevancy of facts
  3. relevancy of opinions
  4. legal presumptions
Question 2 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Opinion of experts is relevant under

  1. Section 45 of Evidence Act
  2. Section 46 of Evidence Act
  3. Both (1) and (2)
  4. None of these
Question 3 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Leading questions are generally asked in

  1. examination in chief
  2. re-examination
  3. cross examination
  4. All of the above
Question 4 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The Indian Evidence Act applies to

  1. proceedings before tribunals
  2. affidavits presented to any court or officer
  3. proceedings before an arbitrator
  4. None of these
Question 5 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

A is accused of B’s murder. Which of the following facts will be ‘relevant’?

  1. A’s going to field with a club.
  2. A’s saying shortly before the incident that he will take a revenge of his father’s death.
  3. A’s fleeing before the police arrived at village.
  4. All of the above
Question 6 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Confessions made while in custody of police are

  1. irrelevant
  2. admissible
  3. inadmissible
  4. relevant
Question 7 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

The Court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened, regard being had to the common course of ___________ in their relation to the facts of the particular case.

  1. natural events
  2. human conduct
  3. public and private business
  4. All of the above
Question 8 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Evidence is of two types,

  1. oral evidence and documentary evidence
  2. general evidence and special evidence
  3. physical evidence and non-physical evidence
  4. None of these
Question 9 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Nemo moriturus proasumitur mentire means

  1. no one attacks me with impunity
  2. no one should be judge in his own case
  3. no one at the time of death is presumed to lie
  4. None of these
Question 10 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following distinctions of a confession from an admission is not correct?

  1. Where conviction can be based on statement alone, it is a confession and where some supplementary evidence is needed to authorise a conviction, it is an admission.
  2. Confession is defined whereas admission is not defined in the Indian Evidence Act.
  3. If the prosecution relies on a statement as being true, it is confession and if the statement is relied on because it is false, it is admission.
  4. In criminal cases, a statement by accused, not amounting to confession, but giving rise to inference that the accused might have committed the crime, is his admission.
Question 11 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Indian Evidence Act came into force in

  1. 1872
  2. 1973
  3. 1893
  4. 1943
Question 12 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Find the mismatch.

  1. Communications during marriage - Section 122
  2. Confession by accused while in custody of police not to be proved against him - Section 26
  3. Dumb witness - Section 119
  4. Professional communications - Section 153
Question 13 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Tape recorded conversation is relevant as an evidence on satisfying the following conditions, except

  1. the voice of the person alleged to be speaking must be identified by the maker of the record or by other who knows it
  2. accuracy of what was actually recorded has to be proved by the maker of the record and satisfactory evidence, direct or circumstantial, has to be there, so as to rule out the possibility of tampering with the record
  3. tape recording must not be before 3 months of the production
  4. the subject matter recorded has to be shown relevant according to the rules of relevancy in the Evidence Act
Question 14 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following cases is not correctly matched?

  1. Bodh Raj vs. State of J & K - Promissory Estoppel
  2. Ram Narain vs. State of UP - Expert Opinion
  3. State of UP vs. Raj Narain - Priveleged Communication
  4. Ravinder Singh vs. State of Haryana - Accomplice Evidence
Question 15 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act does not define

  1. may presume
  2. natural witness
  3. conclusive proof
  4. shall presume
← Back to Quizzes