Multiple choice

Directions: In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer (1) if only argument I is strong; give answer (2) if only argument II is strong; give answer (3) if either I or II is strong; give answer (4) if neither I nor II is strong; and give answer (5) if both I and II are strong.

Should the private companies be allowed to operate passenger train services in India? Arguments: I. Yes. This will improve the quality of service in Indian Railways and it will be faced with severe competition. II. No. The private companies may not agree to operate in the non-profitable sectors.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

I is correct because it presents a reasonable explanation to the situation. On the other hand, II presents an unjustifiable assumption that train services are a non-profitable sector. Even otherwise policy guidelines can be framed to ensure private responsibility. Hence, only I is correct.

Keep practicing — related questions