Multiple choice

Directions: In the question below a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

The commissioner of police has appealed to people not to put up banners which obstruct pedestrian or motor traffic. Conclusions: I. Some of the people may respond and will not put up such banners. II. Policemen will have to keep a watchful eye on the new banners which are being put up on the roads.

  1. Only conclusion I follows.

  2. Only conclusion II follows.

  3. Either conclusion I or II follows.

  4. Both the conclusions follow.

  5. Neither of the conclusions follows.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The appeal seeks a voluntary action. II implies an element of coercion. When an authority makes an appeal, at least a few people are likely to heed.

Keep practicing — related questions