Multiple choice

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments, so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer (1) if only argument I is strong; give answer (2) if only argument II is strong; give answer (3) if one could weaken the other; give answer (4) if neither I nor II is strong; and give answer (5) if both I and II are strong.

Statement: Should non–vegetarian food be totally banned in our country? Arguments: I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country. II. No, nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Totally banning a choice of diet is against democratic characteristics. Hence, this is logical and can be said to be strong.