Multiple choice

Last year, all the candidates who sought employment at ‘Clean n Green’ also applied for a position at ‘Mellow n Yellow’, and ‘Clean n Green’ and ‘Mellow n Yellow’ each offered suitable positions to half of these candidates. Therefore, each one of these candidates must have been offered a suitable position last year.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions about these candidates?

  1. All the candidates were eminently qualified for a suitable position at either ‘Clean n Green’ or ‘Mellow n Yellow’.

  2. All the candidates accepted a position offered at either ‘Clean n Green’ or ‘Mellow n Yellow’.

  3. None of the candidates was offered a suitable position by both ‘Clean n Green’ and ‘Mellow n Yellow’ simultaneously.

  4. None of the candidates had applied for suitable positions at places other than ‘Clean n Green’ and ‘Mellow n Yellow’.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Both the companies have offered suitable positions to exactly half of the total number of candidates but that can add up to a complete hundred percent only if there are no such candidates who have been offered suitable positions by both the companies simultaneously. This is what is stated in option (3). Hence (3)