Multiple choice

Over the years many architects have been appreciated as artists. But since buildings must be useable, architects must pursue their calling with a focus on the practical utility of the end product. For this reason, architecture cannot be classified as an art. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

  1. Some buildings are made to house works of art themselves, they must be artistic.

  2. Some architects are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the buildings they construct.

  3. Architects should be more concerned with the practical utility of the buildings they construct than they currently are.

  4. An article is not a piece of art if its creator pays attention to its practical utility.

  5. Architects who are artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The question states that whatever is made with an eye on the practical utility cannot be qualified as art. A similar thought is expressed by option (4). Hence option (4) is correct.

Keep practicing — related questions