Multiple choice

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

PassageWe inhabit a divided world. On the one hand the rich are critical of our continuing poverty, on the other, they warn us against their own methods. We do no wish to impoverish the environment any further and yet we cannot for a moment forget the grim poverty of large numbers of people. Are not poverty and need the greatest polluters? For instance, unless we are in a position to provide employment and purchasing power for the daily necessities of the tribal people and those who live in or around jungles, we cannot prevent them from combing the forest for food and livelihood, from poaching and from despoiling the vegetation. When they themselves feel, deprived how can we urge the preservation of animals? How can we speak to those who live in villages and in slums about keeping the oceans, the rivers and the air clean when their own lives are contaminated at the source? The environment cannot be improved in conditions of poverty. Nor can poverty be eradicated without the use of science and technology.

Which one of the following statements is NOT true?

  1. We inhabit a divided world.

  2. We do not wish to pollute the environment any further.

  3. The environment can be improved even in the conditions of poverty.

  4. We cannot prevent the people living in or near jungles from combing forest unless we provide them employment and purchasing power for the daily necessities.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The passage clearly states 'The environment cannot be improved in conditions of poverty,' making option C (claiming it CAN be improved in poverty conditions) the statement that is NOT true. Options A, B, and D are all supported by the passage. Option A appears in the first line. Option B is paraphrased from 'We do no wish to impoverish the environment any further.' Option D is directly supported.