Which of the following factors do not explain why the rights included in part III of the constitution are called fundamental I. they are equally available to citizen and aliens II. they are superior to ordinary law III. they are fundamental for governing the country IV. they are not absolute

The question asks which factors do NOT explain why rights are called 'fundamental'. Statement I (available to citizens and aliens alike) and IV (not absolute) actually describe the NATURE of these rights but don't explain WHY they're called FUNDAMENTAL. Statement II (superior to ordinary law) and III (fundamental for governing the country) DO explain the terminology. The term 'fundamental' signifies their supremacy (II) and essential role (III). Therefore, I and IV are the correct answers - they don't explain the nomenclature.