Multiple choice

The passage suggests that bank managers failed to consider whether or not the service improvement mentioned

Directions: This question is based on the following reading passage. Choose the best answer to the  question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

The fact that superior service can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every attempt at improving service will create such an advantage. Investments in service, like those in production and distribution, must be balanced against other types of investments on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction and increased revenues. If a company is already effectively on a par with its competitors because it provides service that avoids a damaging reputation and keeps customers from leaving at an unacceptable rate, then investment in higher service levels may be wasted, since service is a deciding factor for customers only in extreme situations. This truth was not apparent to managers of one regional bank, which failed to improve its competitive position despite its investment in reducing the time a customer had to wait for a teller. The bank managers did not recognize the level of customer inertia in the consumer banking industry that arises from the inconvenience of switching banks. Nor did they analyze their service improvement to determine whether it would attract new customers by producing a new standard of service that would excite customers or by proving difficult for competitors to copy. The only merit of the improvement was that it could easily be described to customers.

 

  1. was too complicated to be easily described to prospective customers

  2. made a measurable change in the experiences of customers in the bank's offices

  3. could be sustained if the number of customers increased significantly

  4. was an innovation that competing banks could have imitated

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The passage states that bank managers failed to analyze whether the service improvement would be difficult for competitors to copy. They didn't determine if their improvement would provide competitive advantage by being hard to imitate. The passage says they should have analyzed whether it would attract customers by being difficult to copy, implying this was a consideration they missed.