Multiple choice

Directions: The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Does revising for regular revision tests reduce the amount of time for students to do other activities?

Arguments: I. Yes, as children suffer from low esteem if they get low marks in revision tests. II. No, as there is no clear evidence that students who study regularly for revision tests do not participate in other activities.

  1. Only I is strong.

  2. Only II is strong.

  3. Both I and II are strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This is the correct answer as this argument is strong and denies convincingly that regular revision tests reduce the amount of time students have for other activities as there is no evidence for the claim made by the statement.

Keep practicing — related questions