Multiple choice

Directions: The passage given below is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage. Key in the number of the option you choose as your answer.

The question whether there exists in man a non-material substance to which he owes his mental life did not come within the orbit of Helvelius’s studies. He touched upon the matter only en passant, and dealt with it most cautiously. On the one hand, he did not want to irritate the censors, for which reason he spoke with obvious deference of the Church, which had “established our faith on this point”. On the other hand, he disliked flights of “philosophical fancy”. We must follow up an observation, he said, halt at the moment it leaves us, and have the courage not to know what, cannot yet be known. This smacks of “reserve” rather than of “vanity” or the “superficial”.

  1. Helvetius approached his subject of study with caution so as to appear sane and complainant with the Church.

  2. Outlandish ideas never found favour with Helvetius as they tended to offend the church.

  3. Helvetius approach can best be termed practical as he disapproved of fanciful notions in the process of inquiry.

  4. Helvetius’s theory professed a guarded inquisitiveness that betrayed the unbridled spirit of inquiry.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation
  1. True, however, this is not the essence of the paragraph.
    1. Not true. Though these ideas did not find favour for him, it wasn’t that they always offended the church. Helvetius also objected to weird notions.
    2. Not true. Not venturing in philosophy can in no manner be termed practical.
    3. True. Helvetius did profess a method of inquiry that disapproved of a liberated spirit of inquiry.