Regard being had to the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act 1956, which of the following statements is not correct?

If a Hindu woman had any existing interest in a property howsoever small, prior to the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act 1956, the same would blossom into a full-fledged right by virtue of the operation of Section 14(1) thereof.

The right of daughter in coparcenary property is not lost by passing of preliminary decree for partition before the 20^th day of December, 2004.

If a right is created in a Hindu female for the first time in respect of any property under any instrument or under a decree, where a restricted estate in such property is prescribed, the provision of Section 14(2) of the above Act would be attracted and would not convert such a right into a full-fledged right of ownership of the property.

The right of daughter in coparcenary property is not lost by any testamentary disposition of property, which had taken place before the 20^th day of December, 2004.