Multiple choice

Mere possibility of abuse or misuse of POTA cannot be a ground to declare it unconstitutiona. Need of POTA is a matter of policy of the government and it cannot be examined by the court. The supreme court of India SO held in

  1. People's union for Civil liberties Vs. Union of India

  2. Narendra Kumar Vs. Union of India

  3. K.S. Bhoir Vs. State of Maharashtra

  4. A.K. Sen Vs. Union of India
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2004), the Supreme Court upheld POTA's constitutional validity, stating that mere possibility of abuse cannot invalidate a law and that preventive policy decisions are for the government, not courts. The Court rejected the challenge to POTA on these grounds.

Keep practicing — related questions