Multiple choice

Facts: In this case, the question was when death is caused by a single blow, whether clause three of section 300 is attracted. In the case in question, the accused persons came armed with deadly weapons and there was an altercation and exchange of hot words where after the accused assaulted victim with a bhala causing injury on the chest rupturing major blood vessels resulting in her instantaneous death. Issue: The accused are guilty of murder or culpable homicide.

  1. It is not murder because a single blow can't be sufficient to cause death.

  2. It is culpable homicide

  3. It is grievous hurt.

  4. It is murder because a single blow can be the cause of death if it is inflicted with as much force and severity which is sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Section 300(3) IPC deals specifically with cases where death is caused by a single blow. The legal position is clear: a single blow can constitute murder if it is inflicted with sufficient force and severity to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. Here, a 'bhala' (spear) causing injury on the chest and rupturing major blood vessels resulting in instantaneous death clearly satisfies this test. The use of a deadly weapon on a vital organ shows intention.