Multiple choice

A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. The fact of previous publications by A respecting B, showing ill-will on the part of A towards B, is relevant

  1. because it proves harming A's reputation

  2. as it is necessary to explain the fact in issue

  3. because it proves A's intention to harm B's reputation

  4. None of these
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) is incorrect: Under the Indian Evidence Act, harm is the consequence of defamation. It is not relevant in evidence. Option (2) is incorrect: Under the Indian Evidence Act, facts in the given situation are not necessary to explain the fact in issue. Option (3) is correct: Under the Indian Evidence Act, it is relevant because the facts are proving A’s intention to harm B’s reputation.

Keep practicing — related questions