‘A’ has lent money to ‘B’ under a written agreement containing an arbitration clause. The agreement does not specify the time of repayment. Rather the money was repayable on demand by ‘A’. ‘A’, after five years of the date when the loan was made, demanded the money which was not repaid by ‘B’. The parties could not arrive at a consensus on the appointment of arbitrator also. ‘A’ filed an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the chief justice of the high court for appointment of an arbitrator. ‘B’ in response to the said application contends that the claim of ‘A’ is stale and barred by time and thus, arbitrator be not appointed. The chief justice
Reveal answer
Fill a bubble to check yourself