Multiple choice

Directions: Given below is a statement of principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among three alternatives given. Encircle your choice and explain why you think your answer is correct in not more than 3 to 4 lines. If it exceeds 4 lines, then penalty may be imposed.

Principle: No legal remedy exists for an injury caused by an act, for which one has consented. Facts: Vijay, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch the one day International Cricket Match between India and Australia, organized by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). As he is absorbed in watching the exploits of Sachin Tendulkar, a ball struck for a six by the latter hits Vijay on his body and injures him. Vijay sues BCCI for reimbursement of the medical bill he paid for treatment of the injury.

  1. Vijay should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not to get injured.

  2. Vijay would lose as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.

  3. BCCI is liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risks of such injuries.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

(2) this is classic case of volenti non fit injuria, i.e. voluntary taking of risk. Since Vijay has voluntarily taken the risk that come with attending a cricket match, he cannot expect BCCI to compensate him for any injuries arising out of the same.

Keep practicing — related questions