A court may deny specific performance of an agreement to sell an immovable property if
it is of the opinion that the consideration is inadequate
the court feels that the contract is onerous to the defendant
the performance of the contract would involve hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee and non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff
Under Section 19(3) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, courts may deny specific performance if the contract's execution would cause undue hardship on the defendant that they could not have foreseen, while non-performance would not cause comparable hardship to the plaintiff. Inadequate consideration alone is not a ground for refusal, nor is the mere fact that the contract appears onerous.