Using the Havel-Hakimi theorem: A sequence is graphical if all degrees are non-negative, sum is even, and the sequence can be reduced to all zeros by repeatedly removing the largest element d and subtracting 1 from the next d elements. Sequence I (7,6,5,4,4,3,2,1): sum=32 (even). After reductions: 7×(6,5,4,4,3,2)→(5,4,3,3,2,1); 5×(4,3,3,2,1)→(2,2,1,1,1); 2×(2,1,1,1)→(1,0,0,1); sorting gives (1,1,0,0); 1×(1,0,0)→(0,-1,0) - NEGATIVE, so NOT graphical. Sequence II (6,6,6,6,3,3,2,2): 6×(6,6,6,3,3,2)→(5,5,5,2,2,1); 5×(5,5,2,2,1)→(4,4,1,1,0); sort: (4,4,1,1,0); 4×(4,1,1,0)→(3,0,0,-1) - NEGATIVE, so NOT graphical. Sequence III (7,6,6,4,4,3,2,2): 7×(6,6,4,4,3,2,2)→(5,5,3,3,2,1,1); 5×(5,3,3,2,1,1)→(4,2,2,1,0,0); 4×(2,2,1,0,0)→(1,1,-1,0,0) - NEGATIVE, NOT graphical? Wait, let me redo this more carefully... Actually for III: 7,6,6,4,4,3,2,2; remove 7: subtract from next 7: (5,5,3,3,2,1,2); sort: (5,5,3,3,2,2,1); remove 5: subtract from next 5: (4,2,2,1,1,1); sort: (4,2,2,1,1,1); remove 4: subtract from next 4: (1,1,0,0,1); sort: (1,1,1,0,0); remove 1: (0,0,0,0) - all zeros! So III IS graphical. Sequence IV (8,7,7,6,4,2,1,1): sum=36 (even, good). Remove 8: subtract from next 8 elements but only 7 exist - can't subtract 8 from 7 elements, so immediately NOT graphical. Also, in any simple graph, no vertex can have degree ≥ n-1. Here n=8, so max degree is 7. Having degree 8 is impossible. Therefore II and IV are NOT graphical. Answer is D.