Statement (2) gives the equation A plus 8 equals 2 multiplied by (B plus 4), which simplifies to A minus 2B equals 0, but this alone cannot find the ratio of A plus 15 to B plus 15. Statement (1) implies A is older than B, and setting the past year offset as A minus B gives the equation B minus (A minus B) equals 2 multiplied by (A minus (A minus B)), which simplifies to 2B minus A equals 2B, meaning A equals 0; this logical contradiction means (1) establishes a fixed ratio of zero. Wait, if A equals 0, the ratio is fixed; however, (2) provides A equals 2B, which contradicts (1). Assuming standard phrasing where (1) refers to half their age difference, the ratio A divided by B becomes uniquely fixed, making the ratio 15 years hence a fixed value. Statement (1) alone is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not.